Trustee Nohr…Report #10 SD 61
First Priority Always…Advocacy for Our Children
November 19, 2012 Public Board Meeting Please read Trustee McNally’s blog at ‘Lined Paper McNally’…lots of great information and ideas!
Highlights: Victoria High School Choir
Thank you to students and staff for a beautiful performance! Their song was performed at their Remembrance Day assembly.
Wi Fi presentations
Trustee McNally has an extensive review the the wifi issue on her blog, Lined Paper. It is very through and very compelling. Here are a few excerpts to give you a little background.
“That the Board of Education of School District no. 61 (Greater Victoria) establish a moratorium on WiFi installations in elementary schools until the WiFi Committee has completed its work.”
Over two years ago this was the motion and direction from the Board but this did not happen.
- June 20, 2011 Board Meeting: The Chair declined to allow discussion on the following motions. “Due to discussions on the same topics, there was no action on these motions.”
That the Board of Education of School District no. 61 (Greater Victoria) establish a moratorium on WiFi installations in elementary schools until the WiFi Committee has completed its work.
That the Board […etc…] direct the architects (name of firm) to include the channels for wired technology in the plans for Oak Bay High School to: a) make it possible to accommodate students and staff with electromagnetic sensitivities; b) make it possible to provide wired technology throughout the school should future scientific research make it necessary; and c) to review the European models banning WiFi in schools.
Late note: At the OPPS meeting last night, November 14, VCPAC requested that the WiFi committee report be put on hold until January or February until VCPAC has further study of the issue (remember the previous request from VCPAC to have the recommendation go to OPPS in June 2011). I voted for this postponement as Duncan Morrison may refile his suit against the Portland Public Schools alleging negative effects of EMF on his child, a student in Portland Schools.
At the Nov.19th Board meeting members of the community provided more current information about the need to understand the impact of electro-magnetic radiation on young children who are more vulnerable.
Walt McGinnis asked if the Board has the authority to make safety decisions for the District? It is my opinion that this is a very central role for the Board. The mission statement for SD 61 is to ‘ensure a responsive and safe learning environment for every student’ and therefore it is my intention to bring forward or support a motion to have all elementary schools hard wired only at this time following the Precautionary Principle. Mr. McGinnis reminded us that medical authorities do not have expertise in this area and they may evaluate medical data but not neurological impact. He reminded us that we once lived in environment filled with lead, DDT, benzine, asbestos, tobacco and these substances have caused many serious health complications. There is NO research on the impact on children because research is not allowed on children…the catch 22!
Tammy Jeske spoke of her intimate knowledge about the negative effects of EMR on children because she is now home schooling her son who has experienced serious reactions. She expressed concern that the current motion on the agenda that resulted from the wifi committee directions does not go far enough. She requested that teachers remove all unofficial wifi installations. At this time, we have 11 out of 29 elementary schools with unofficial routers. Ms. Jeske reminded us that there is no district over site of official or unofficial wifi router hot spots or strength of EMR emissions ( DNA mutations, more absorption of radiation and thinner skulls leading to other forms of neurological impact. Ms. Jeske reminded the Board that parents have not been informed or given their consent.
Janice Hoffman spoke about the liability issues the Board may face. In May, 2012, the World Health Organization recommended prudent avoidance. Research has been conducted with induction heat not non- thermal biological effects and that is what is becoming apparent for more and more children and adults. Wi fi is a connection only and our schools can achieve most of the same instructional results using a hard wired installation.
I don’t support school by school decisions for wifi installation. The Board should make a district determination based on health, safety and the precautionary principle.
Motions, Motions, Motions… very relevant to the classroom experience for your children.
wifi motion- Trustee Leonard brought the following new motion to the table and it was accepted for debate by Chair Orcherton.
1) That the Board of Education of School District No. 61 (Greater Victoria) direct the Superintendent to ensure that no new routers be placed in any school until such time as the Board of Education has changed its present direction.
Carried-Leonard, Orcherton, Ferris, Nohr, Alpha, Horsman, McEvoy Against-Loring-Kuhanga, McNally
* The situation is now very complex because many teachers have brought their own routers into their schools. The district has not been informed about this situation and parents have not been informed either. I don’t believe that most school PACs have had a full discussion about the current neurological impact for children by EMR. Almost all educational instruction can be accomplished using the safer hard wired technology. It is less expensive for our district and I would rather use funding for newer computers to update classrooms and labs. George Jay became our first wireless elementary school almost two years ago.
2) Moved-Nohr Seconded- Alpha
That the Board of Education of School District 61 (Greater Victoria) provide the new Minister of Education, Don McRae, with an advocacy letter requesting new targeted funding for students in grades K to 3 who present with significant learning or behavioural challenges. before they become a priority for psycho-educational assessments and Individual Educational Plan support. Additionally, this letter be sent to the Leader of the Opposition, Adrian Dix and to the education critic, Robin Austin.
3)Moved-Nohr Seconded- Loring-Kuhanga
That the Board of Education of School District 61 (Greater Victoria) provide the new Minister of Education, Don McRae, with an advocacy letter requesting additional funding to existing funding for students with designations on the autism spectrum (A.S.D.) or with intensive behaviour. Additionally, this letter be sent to the Leader of the Opposition, Adrian Dix and to the education critic, Robin Austin.
Carried-Unanimously * motions 2 and 3 will be incorporated into one letter to the Minister
Trustee Leonard requested that the next two motions be reviewed at the next Education policy meeting and this would include a presentation to provide a full background on the development of this initiative. FYi…Quebec puts $10.3M into early childhood education and receives $10.6 back into general provincial revenues.
4)-Moved- Nohr Second- Alpha
That the Board of Education of School District 61 (Greater Victoria) endorse the Community Plan for a Public System of Integrated Early Care and Learning, otherwise known as the $10/Day/Child Care Plan.
1. Universal fully funded
2. Hub- where services are provided to families
3. Parameters- tied to the Framework for Early Learning
4. Consensus- overall policy for childcare
5. All early learning-no separating of care and learning
That the Board of Education of School District 61 (Greater Victoria) encourage awareness of the $10/Day/Child Care Plan to our partner groups and request that they endorse the program as well.
5)Moved- Nohr Seconded-
That the Board of Education of School District 61 (Greater Victoria) provide the new Minister of Education, Don McRae, with an advocacy letter requesting the reinstatement of full targeted funding for students with learning disabilities designations. Additionally, this letter be sent to the Leader of the Opposition, Adrian Dix and to the Education Critic, Robin Austin.
Motion defeated: For- Trustees Nohr, Alpha, Loring-Kuhanga and McNally Against: Trustees Orcherton, Horsman, Leonard and Ferris Absent: Trustee McEvoy
* I will write my own letter to the Minister of Education about the need for targeted funding for students with learning disability designations. An overwhelming majority of teachers support this position od restoring targeted funding.
Here is my rationale:
1. The landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Canada (Nov.8, 2012) states that school districts have a responsibility to accommodate and provide core academic instruction for students with learning disability designations. It is a fundamental human right.
2.”Adequate special education is not a dispensable luxury,” Judge Abella said in a 9-0 majority. “For those with severe learning disabilities, it is a ramp that provides access to the statutory commitment to education made to ALL children in British Columbia.”
3. Disproportional cuts have been made to special education programs.
4. The serious downward shift in GDP for public education ( 26% to 14.8%) have been the major cause for thousands of students being denied basic access to core instruction.
5. A. Wayne MacKay, a Dalhousie Univerisity law professor, said, “In my opinion, this may be the most important human rights case in the last decade or so.”
The basic human rights of our special education students have been neglected.
6) That the Board of Education of School District No. 61(Great Victoria ) develop and implement a stewardship report for all Board meetings to include the action take, person responsible and progress report (which may include a timeline and/or date of progress report).
* This motion was referred to the next available OPPs meeting.
Rationale: I thought that this would provide more easy access for the public since the format would be readable at a glance.
*** Trustee Loring -Kuhanga tried to bring forward a substantively revised motion for Q&A at our Public Board meetings and it was denied by Chair Orcherton.
*A new Ad Hoc Committee has been established. It is called Culture and Community Committee … We had our first meeting and it was enormously successful. All partner groups had representatives at the meeting. I was so impressed with the insights and skill sets of our educational assistants that interact with our students in the classroom, on the playground, in the hallways and when they are by themselves feeling sad or left out or bullied. We have many, many professionals and para professionals who have extensive skill sets to help and support students through their daily small trials and major social-emotional challenges, including all types of bullying. We will be working to develop a detailed district policy for anti-bullying.
Remember…bullying can also be looked at as racism, anti-Semitism, and misogyny.
* $15,000 per project is now available. Greater Victoria will be applying for this funding to help eliminate bullying.
Deborah Nohr ( 250-380-0888 or 250-896-0808-c )
Please write a quick e-mail…and express your ideas and feedback to the Premier and Minister of Education.
• MLA Finder- drop down menu / easy to use
• email@example.com education critic
Premier Christy Clark Wants 10 Years Without Any Labour Disruption for BC Teachers
Premier Clark ‘imagined’ students in grade two continuing through to grade 12 without any threat of labour disruption. I would like to assure Premier Clark that all teachers, support staff, families and citizens would also like to see this. However, Premier Clark has lost sight of the most critical detail necessary to bring this to pass.
In 2002, Minister of Education, Christy Clark passed Bill 28, Public Education Flexibility and Choice Act, which resulted in removing approximately $275 million from public education funding EACH YEAR. This was a devastating blow.
As a trustee and a retired teacher I also, ‘imagine’ ALL students from kindergarten to grade 12 experiencing a highly effective educational experience based on more teachers to meet more needs, less split grades, more learning support teachers to target our bright students with learning disabilities, much more counselling support, full-time educational assistance for full-time students was significant and severe behaviour challenges and proactive educational assessments for high need students who enter the system in kindergarten, grade one and two.
I encourage every citizen in our community to realize and support the necessity of reinstating this very essential funding. The 80% of our citizens who do not have children in our public education system should understand that public education, the great builder of equality, most definitely has the potential to create literate and competent students who then bring greater employment, higher levels of employment, stability, creativity and vitality to our communities.